A tech pack is the most underrated document in fashion and apparel sourcing. Done well, it eliminates 80% of the back-and-forth between buyer and factory and produces accurate quotes on the first round. Done poorly, or skipped entirely, it guarantees confusion, missed details, and expensive sample rounds.
The gap between an amateur tech pack and a professional one is not artistic skill. It is structure, completeness, and clarity. This guide walks through what to include, in the format and detail that Asian manufacturers actually use during production.
From the factory's perspective, every missing detail is either a guess, a question for the buyer, or an excuse if something goes wrong. A well-built tech pack does three things at once:
The best sourcing relationships are built on documents, not conversations. Conversations get forgotten and reinterpreted. Documents don't.
One page with: product name and code, season or collection, version number, date of last update, buyer name and contact, intended size range, and any reference style numbers from previous production.
Version control matters. A tech pack that gets revised five times during sampling needs clear version numbers so the factory knows which one is current.
Flat sketches (called "flats" in the industry), not artistic renderings. Black line drawings showing the silhouette and all visible design elements: seams, panels, closures, pockets, trims, topstitching.
Include front, back, and at least one side view. If the product has interior details (linings, internal pockets, construction features), include interior views too.
Zoomed-in views of specific construction features: how a zipper is set, how a collar is built, how a binding is finished. Each callout should have a clear arrow or reference to where it sits on the main drawing.
This is where most tech packs fail. A "regular collar" means nothing. A drawn detail showing fold-over depth, topstitching distance, and stitch count means something.
A table listing every material in the product:
| Component | Material / Composition | Color | Supplier | Placement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main fabric | 95% cotton 5% elastane, 220 gsm | Pantone 19-4052 TCX | Open | Body |
| Lining | 100% polyester, 60 gsm | Black | Open | Body interior |
| Zipper | YKK #5 metal | Antique brass | YKK specified | Center front |
| Main label | Woven, 30mm × 50mm | White ground, black logo | Buyer-supplied artwork | Center back neck |
Specify Pantone codes for colors, GSM for fabrics, and brand requirements for trims that matter.
A table of every measurement point with tolerances, across all sizes. Common measurement points for tops include: chest, waist, hip, body length, sleeve length, shoulder width, neck opening, armhole.
Include tolerances (typically ±0.5 cm to ±1.5 cm depending on the point) and reference how each measurement is taken. "Chest measured 1 inch below armhole, flat, doubled" leaves no room for interpretation.
How is each seam constructed? Specify:
Specify every label: main brand label, size label, care label, country of origin label. Include placement, dimensions, and artwork files. For packaging: polybag specs, hangtag artwork, folding instructions, master carton dimensions, units per carton.
Packaging is often where last-minute confusion strikes. Specify it as carefully as you specify the product itself.
State the inspection standard (typically AQL 2.5 for major defects, AQL 4.0 for minor defects), any specific tests required (colorfastness, shrinkage, tear strength), and what constitutes a rejectable defect.
For technical apparel including equestrian, breeches, and outerwear, add functional tests: water resistance ratings, abrasion resistance, seam strength.
Whenever possible, attach reference photos of similar products you've produced before, competitor products with notes on what to copy and what to change, or fit samples from previous seasons.
A factory that sees three reference images of the silhouette you want will be 10x more accurate than one working from text descriptions alone.
| Format | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Universal, no version conflicts, easy to comment on | Hard to edit if revisions needed | |
| Excel | Easy to update measurements, BOM, costing | Drawings are harder to embed cleanly |
| Specialized PLM software | Professional, version controlled | Overkill for small operations |
Practical recommendation: for most small and mid-sized buyers, an Excel master file for measurements and BOM, plus a PDF for drawings and construction details, is the optimal combination. Easy to update, easy to send, easy for factories to print and use on the floor.
The most common errors that lead to sample failures:
Some buyers skip the tech pack and rely on reference samples or verbal descriptions. This sometimes works for very simple products (basic T-shirts, plain bedsheets) with experienced suppliers. For anything more complex, it doesn't.
The cost of skipping a tech pack typically shows up as: more sample rounds, surprise charges during production, quality disputes after shipment, and inconsistent results across reorders.
Tier-1 factories are selective about which buyers they work with. A clean, professional tech pack signals that you are a serious buyer who will manage the relationship properly. The opposite signals an inexperienced buyer, and many strong factories will quietly route those inquiries to junior staff or pass entirely.
Your tech pack is your business card with manufacturers. The quality of the document tells them what kind of partner you are likely to be.
The framework we use internally before recommending any supplier. Covers legal verification, capability assessment, certifications, sampling, audits, and trial orders.
Read article →Seven tactics that work, the mistakes that get you rejected, and when to stop pushing. Based on dozens of real MOQ negotiations across Asia.
Read article →Tell us about your project. We will come back within 48 hours.
Get in touchProducts
Get in Touch